Corrected Kriging update formulae for batch-sequential data assimilation
Cl\'ement Chevalier (IRSN-SEC), David Ginsbourger

TL;DR
This paper corrects the formulas for updating Kriging variances and covariances in batch-sequential data assimilation, ensuring accurate computations when multiple observations are integrated simultaneously.
Contribution
It provides corrected mathematical expressions for Kriging variance and covariance updates in batch-sequential assimilation, addressing inaccuracies in prior work.
Findings
Corrected formulas for Kriging variance updates.
Validated the accuracy of the new formulas.
Enhanced computational efficiency in data assimilation.
Abstract
Recently, a lot of effort has been paid to the efficient computation of Kriging predictors when observations are assimilated sequentially. In particular, Kriging update formulae enabling significant computational savings were derived in Barnes and Watson (1992), Gao et al. (1996), and Emery (2009). Taking advantage of the previous Kriging mean and variance calculations helps avoiding a costly matrix inversion when adding one observation to the already available ones. In addition to traditional update formulae taking into account a single new observation, Emery (2009) also proposed formulae for the batch-sequential case, i.e. when new observations are simultaneously assimilated. However, the Kriging variance and covariance formulae given without proof in Emery (2009) for the batch-sequential case are not correct. In this paper we fix this issue and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
