Nonspinning searches for spinning binaries in ground-based detector data: Amplitude and mismatch predictions in the constant precession cone approximation
Duncan A. Brown (1), Andrew Lundgren (1,2,3), and Richard, O'Shaughnessy (2,4) ((1) Syracuse University, (2) Penn State University, (3), Albert Einstein Institute, Hannover, (4) University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee)

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how neglecting precession in gravitational-wave searches affects sensitivity, providing a geometric model to estimate the mismatch between precessing signals and non-spinning templates.
Contribution
It introduces a constant precession cone approximation to predict waveform mismatches and estimates the best possible fitting factor for non-precessing templates against precessing signals.
Findings
The secular evolution of precession can be categorized into three distinct types.
The geometric model predicts the maximum mismatch based on precession cone orientation.
Certain viewing geometries lead to the poorest matches with non-spinning templates.
Abstract
Current searches for compact binary mergers by ground-based gravitational-wave detectors assume for simplicity the two bodies are not spinning. If the binary contains compact objects with significant spin, then this can reduce the sensitivity of these searches, particularly for black hole--neutron star binaries. In this paper we investigate the effect of neglecting precession on the sensitivity of searches for spinning binaries using non-spinning waveform models. We demonstrate that in the sensitive band of Advanced LIGO, the angle between the binary's orbital angular momentum and its total angular momentum is approximately constant. Under this \emph{constant precession cone} approximation, we show that the gravitational-wave phasing is modulated in two ways: a secular increase of the gravitational-wave phase due to precession and an oscillation around this secular increase. We show…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
