Performance Analysis of Adaptive Physical Layer Network Coding for Wireless Two-way Relaying

TL;DR

This paper analyzes the performance of adaptive physical layer network coding in wireless two-way relaying, deriving bounds on error rates and demonstrating the benefits of adaptivity in mitigating fade effects.

Contribution

It provides an upper bound on end-to-end SER in Rician fading scenarios and shows how adaptive network coding improves error performance by reducing the impact of removable singular fade states.

Findings

Adaptive network coding reduces error rates at high SNR.

Error events due to removable singular fade states decrease faster with SNR when using adaptive coding.

The scheme offers a coding gain over non-adaptive methods.

Abstract

The analysis of modulation schemes for the physical layer network-coded two way relaying scenario is presented which employs two phases: Multiple access (MA) phase and Broadcast (BC) phase. It was shown by Koike-Akino et. al. that adaptively changing the network coding map used at the relay according to the channel conditions greatly reduces the impact of multiple access interference which occurs at the relay during the MA phase. Depending on the signal set used at the end nodes, deep fades occur for a finite number of channel fade states referred as the singular fade states. The singular fade states fall into the following two classes: The ones which are caused due to channel outage and whose harmful effect cannot be mitigated by adaptive network coding are referred as the \textit{non-removable singular fade states}. The ones which occur due to the choice of the signal set and whose harmful effects can be removed by a proper choice of the adaptive network coding map are referred as the \textit{removable} singular fade states. In this paper, we derive an upper bound on the average end-to-end Symbol Error Rate (SER), with and without adaptive network coding at the relay, for a Rician fading scenario. It is shown that without adaptive network coding, at high Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), the contribution to the end-to-end SER comes from the following error events which fall as $\text{SNR}^{-1}$: the error events associated with the removable singular fade states, the error events associated with the non-removable singular fade states and the error event during the BC phase. In contrast, for the adaptive network coding scheme, the error events associated with the removable singular fade states contributing to the average end-to-end SER fall as $\text{SNR}^{-2}$ and as a result the adaptive network coding scheme provides a coding gain over the case when adaptive network coding is not used.