Intensity and polarization of the atmospheric emission at millimetric wavelengths at Dome Concordia
E. S. Battistelli (Rome-Sapienza), G. Amico (Rome-Sapienza), A. Ba\`u, (Milan-Bicocca), L. Berg\'e (Paris Sud), \'E. Br\'eelle (APC-Paris), R., Charlassier (APC-Paris), S. Collin (Paris Sud), A. Cruciani (Rome-Sapienza),, P. de Bernardis (Rome-Sapienza), C. Dufour (APC-Paris)

TL;DR
This study measures atmospheric emission intensity and polarization at Dome C, Antarctica, demonstrating extremely low optical depth and polarization levels, which make it an excellent site for millimeter-wave astronomy and CMB observations.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed measurements of atmospheric emission polarization at Dome C, including upper limits on polarized signals and atmospheric transparency, enhancing site characterization for millimeter astronomy.
Findings
Optical depth at 150 GHz is very low (<tau>=0.050 ± 0.003 ± 0.011).
Atmospheric polarization is below 0.2% circular and 0.1% linear (95% CL).
The atmosphere shows high stability and low PWV (~0.77 mm).
Abstract
Atmospheric emission is a dominant source of disturbance in ground-based astronomy at mm wavelengths. The Antarctic plateau is recognized to be an ideal site for mm and sub-mm observations, and the French/Italian base of Dome C is among the best sites on Earth for these observations. In this paper we present measurements, performed using the BRAIN-pathfinder experiment, at Dome C of the atmospheric emission in intensity and polarization at 150GHz, one of the best observational frequencies for CMB observations when considering cosmic signal intensity, atmospheric transmission, detectors sensitivity, and foreground removal. Careful characterization of the air-mass synchronous emission has been performed, acquiring more that 380 elevation scans (i.e. "skydip") during the third BRAIN-pathfinder summer campaign in December 2009/January 2010. The extremely high transparency of the Antarctic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
