The characterization of Virgo data and its impact on gravitational-wave searches
J. Aasi, J. Abadie, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M., Abernathy, T. Accadia, F. Acernese, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R., Adhikari, C. Affeldt, M. Agathos, K. Agatsuma, P. Ajith, B. Allen, A., Allocca, E. Amador Ceron, D. Amariutei, S. B. Anderson, W. G. Anderson

TL;DR
This paper reviews Virgo detector noise sources, their characterization, and mitigation strategies, demonstrating how improved noise understanding enhances gravitational-wave search sensitivity during the first three observing runs.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of Virgo noise sources, propagation, and mitigation techniques, improving the data quality for gravitational-wave searches.
Findings
Identification and mitigation of noise sources
Effective exclusion of noise transients and spectral lines
Enhanced astrophysical reach of GW searches
Abstract
Between 2007 and 2010 Virgo collected data in coincidence with the LIGO and GEO gravitational-wave (GW) detectors. These data have been searched for GWs emitted by cataclysmic phenomena in the universe, by non-axisymmetric rotating neutron stars or from a stochastic background in the frequency band of the detectors. The sensitivity of GW searches is limited by noise produced by the detector or its environment. It is therefore crucial to characterize the various noise sources in a GW detector. This paper reviews the Virgo detector noise sources, noise propagation, and conversion mechanisms which were identified in the three first Virgo observing runs. In many cases, these investigations allowed us to mitigate noise sources in the detector, or to selectively flag noise events and discard them from the data. We present examples from the joint LIGO-GEO-Virgo GW searches to show how well…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
