Achieving Consensus with Individual Centrality Approach
Vitri Tundjungsari, Jazi Eko Istiyanto, Edi Winarko, Retantyo Wardoyo

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel consensus model in participatory decision making that uses an advice centrality approach with a Supra Decision Maker to evaluate alternatives and achieve consensus.
Contribution
It presents a new consensus model employing advice centrality and a Supra Decision Maker to improve decision-making processes.
Findings
The model effectively evaluates alternatives considering consensus levels.
The approach incorporates Social Judgment Scheme for unresolved decisions.
A simple example demonstrates the model's application.
Abstract
This paper proposes a new consensus model in participatory decision making. The model employs advice centrality approach by electing a leader and recommender named as Supra Decision Maker (SDM). A SDM has a role as a decision bench-marker to other decision makers in evaluating each alternative with respect to given criteria. The weighting value for each alternative can be obtained by considering consensus level and preferences' distances between SDM and other Decision Makers. A social function using Social Judgment Scheme (SJS) concept is employed when a decision does not achieve the required consensus level. A simple example is presented here to illustrate our model. Keywords: Consensus, Group decision making, Centrality, Supra Decision Maker, Social Judgment Scheme
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Criteria Decision Making · Cognitive Science and Mapping
