The Planetary Nebula Luminosity Function at the Dawn of Gaia
Robin Ciardullo

TL;DR
This paper reviews and compares the planetary nebula luminosity function (PNLF) as a distance measurement tool, calibrates it against other methods, and discusses how space missions can enhance understanding of planetary nebulae and improve cosmic distance scales.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive calibration of the PNLF method, compares it with other distance indicators, and explores how Gaia and Kepler data can refine planetary nebula physics and distance measurements.
Findings
PNLF distances agree with Cepheid and TRGB calibrations within uncertainties.
Surface Brightness Fluctuation method yields ~15% larger distances than PNLF.
Systematic errors from internal reddening likely explain discrepancies between methods.
Abstract
The [O III] 5007 Planetary Nebula Luminosity Function (PNLF) is an excellent extragalactic standard candle. In theory, the PNLF method should not work at all, since the luminosities of the brightest planetary nebulae (PNe) should be highly sensitive to the age of their host stellar population. Yet the method appears robust, as it consistently produces < 10% distances to galaxies of all Hubble types, from the earliest ellipticals to the latest-type spirals and irregulars. It is therefore uniquely suited for cross-checking the results of other techniques and finding small offsets between the Population I and Population II distance ladders. We review the calibration of the method and show that the zero points provided by Cepheids and the Tip of the Red Giant Branch are in excellent agreement. We then compare the results of the PNLF with those from Surface Brightness Fluctuation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
