The clustering of intermediate redshift quasars as measured by the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey
Martin White, Adam D. Myers, Nicholas P. Ross, David J. Schlegel,, Joseph F. Hennawi, Yue Shen, Ian McGreer, Michael A. Strauss, Adam S. Bolton,, Jo Bovy, X. Fan, Jordi Miralda-Escude, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, I. Paris, P., Petitjean, D. P. Schneider, M. Viel, David H. Weinberg

TL;DR
This study measures the clustering of intermediate redshift quasars using the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey, providing precise correlation functions and insights into quasar halo occupation at z~2.4.
Contribution
It presents the largest homogeneous quasar sample at these redshifts for clustering analysis, with improved precision and constraints on quasar halo occupation and duty cycle.
Findings
Correlation function well fit by power-laws with specific slopes and amplitudes
Clustering amplitude shows no strong luminosity or redshift dependence
Quasars inhabit halos with a characteristic mass of ~10^{12} Msun/h and a 1% duty cycle
Abstract
We measure the quasar two-point correlation function over the redshift range 2.2<z<2.8 using data from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey. We use a homogeneous subset of the data consisting of 27,129 quasars with spectroscopic redshifts---by far the largest such sample used for clustering measurements at these redshifts to date. The sample covers 3,600 square degrees, corresponding to a comoving volume of 9.7(Gpc/h)^3 assuming a fiducial LambdaCDM cosmology, and it has a median absolute i-band magnitude of -26, k-corrected to z=2. After accounting for redshift errors we find that the redshift space correlation function is fit well by a power-law of slope -2 and amplitude s_0=(9.7\pm 0.5)Mpc/h over the range 3<s<25Mpc/h. The projected correlation function, which integrates out the effects of peculiar velocities and redshift errors, is fit well by a power-law of slope -1 and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
