Astrophysical foregrounds and primordial tensor-to-scalar ratio constraints from CMB B-mode polarization observations
Josquin Errard, Radek Stompor

TL;DR
This paper investigates how astrophysical foregrounds impact the ability of CMB B-mode polarization experiments to measure the primordial tensor-to-scalar ratio, emphasizing the importance of foreground control and sky area selection for future mission sensitivity.
Contribution
It demonstrates that foreground residuals can be minimized with optimized component separation and sky area restriction, significantly improving constraints on r in future CMB experiments.
Findings
Foreground residuals do not limit the detection of very low r in ideal conditions.
Restricting analysis to smaller sky areas can improve constraints on r by over an order of magnitude.
Proper modeling and calibration are crucial for accurate foreground removal and r estimation.
Abstract
We study the effects of astrophysical foregrounds on the ability of CMB B-mode polarization experiments to constrain the primordial tensor-to-scalar ratio, r. To clean the foreground contributions we use parametric, maximum likelihood component separation technique, and consider experimental setups optimized to render a minimal level of the foreground residuals in the recovered CMB map. We consider nearly full-sky observations, include two diffuse foreground components, dust and synchrotron, and study cases with and without calibration errors, spatial variability of the foreground properties, and partial or complete B-mode lensing signal removal. In all these cases we find that in the limit of very low noise level and in the absence of the intrumental or modeling systematic effects, the foreground residuals do not lead to a limit on the lowest detectable value of r. But the need to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
