Measurement and Calibration of Noise Bias in Weak Lensing Galaxy Shape Estimation
Tomasz Kacprzak, Joe Zuntz, Barnaby Rowe, Sarah Bridle, Alexandre, Refregier, Adam Amara, Lisa Voigt, Michael Hirsch

TL;DR
This paper investigates how pixel noise impacts shear bias in weak lensing galaxy shape estimation, demonstrating a calibration method that significantly reduces bias to meet future survey accuracy requirements.
Contribution
It introduces a simulation-based calibration approach to correct noise-induced shear biases in maximum-likelihood galaxy shape measurements.
Findings
Noise can cause 1-10% shear bias in measurements.
Calibration reduces bias to acceptable levels for upcoming surveys.
Method improves the accuracy of weak lensing shear estimates.
Abstract
Weak gravitational lensing has the potential to constrain cosmological parameters to high precision. However, as shown by the Shear TEsting Programmes (STEP) and GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing (GREAT) Challenges, measuring galaxy shears is a nontrivial task: various methods introduce different systematic biases which have to be accounted for. We investigate how pixel noise on the image affects the bias on shear estimates from a Maximum-Likelihood forward model-fitting approach using a sum of co-elliptical S\'{e}rsic profiles, in complement to the theoretical approach of an an associated paper. We evaluate the bias using a simple but realistic galaxy model and find that the effects of noise alone can cause biases of order 1-10% on measured shears, which is significant for current and future lensing surveys. We evaluate a simulation-based calibration method to create a bias model…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
