Rossiter-McLaughlin Effect Measurements for WASP-16, WASP-25 and WASP-31
D. J. A. Brown, A. Collier Cameron, D. R. Anderson, B. Enoch, C., Hellier, P. F. L. Maxted, G. R. M. Miller, D. Pollacco, D. Queloz, E., Simpson, B. Smalley, A. H. M. J. Triaud, I. Boisse, F. Bouchy, M. Gillon, G., Hebrard

TL;DR
This paper reports new Rossiter-McLaughlin effect measurements for three WASP exoplanet systems, analyzing their spin-orbit alignments and discussing implications for theories of planetary system evolution.
Contribution
It provides the first combined photometric and spectroscopic analysis of these systems, refining their spin-orbit angles and contributing to the statistical understanding of planetary alignments.
Findings
WASP-16 is a slow rotator with a near-aligned orbit.
WASP-25 has a slight misalignment in its spin-orbit angle.
WASP-31 is well-aligned, supporting trends for cool stars.
Abstract
We present new measurements of the Rossiter-McLaughlin (RM) effect for three WASP planetary systems, WASP-16, WASP-25 and WASP-31, from a combined analysis of their complete sets of photometric and spectroscopic data. We find a low amplitude RM effect for WASP-16 (Teff = 5700 \pm 150K), suggesting that the star is a slow rotator and thus of an advanced age, and obtain a projected alignment angle of lambda = -4.2 degrees +11.0 -13.9. For WASP-25 (Teff = 5750\pm100K) we detect a projected spin-orbit angle of lambda = 14.6 degrees \pm6.7. WASP-31 (Teff = 6300\pm100K) is found to be well-aligned, with a projected spin-orbit angle of lambda = 2.8degrees \pm3.1. A circular orbit is consistent with the data for all three systems, in agreement with their respective discovery papers. We consider the results for these systems in the context of the ensemble of RM measurements made to date. We find…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
