A survey of proof nets and matrices for substructural logics
Sean A. Fulop

TL;DR
This survey compares matrix methods and proof nets across substructural logics, introducing a new proof net approach for nonassociative Lambek systems and providing a unified notation for comparison.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive overview of proof schemes for substructural logics, including a novel proof net treatment for nonassociative Lambek logic and a unified notation for comparison.
Findings
Unified notation facilitates comparison of proof schemes
Novel proof nets for nonassociative Lambek logic introduced
Survey covers a range of substructural logics from classical to nonassociative
Abstract
This paper is a survey of two kinds of "compressed" proof schemes, the \emph{matrix method} and \emph{proof nets}, as applied to a variety of logics ranging along the substructural hierarchy from classical all the way down to the nonassociative Lambek system. A novel treatment of proof nets for the latter is provided. Descriptions of proof nets and matrices are given in a uniform notation based on sequents, so that the properties of the schemes for the various logics can be easily compared.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, programming, and type systems · Formal Methods in Verification · Advanced Algebra and Logic
