
TL;DR
This paper reviews the current knowledge of small bodies' densities in our solar system, analyzing their physical properties, compositional differences, and internal structures based on a comprehensive collection of 287 estimates.
Contribution
It compiles and critically assesses density estimates of small bodies, highlighting trends related to size, composition, and internal porosity, and discusses methods to improve measurement accuracy.
Findings
Dwarf planets have no macroporosity.
Smaller bodies tend to have larger voids and lower densities.
C and S-complex asteroids show increasing density with size.
Abstract
A considerable amount of information regarding the processes that occurred during the accretion of the early planetesimals is still present among the small bodies of our solar system. A review of our current knowledge of the density of small bodies is presented here. Intrinsic physical properties of small bodies are sought by searching for relationships between the dynamical and taxonomic classes, size, and density. Mass and volume estimates for 287 small bodies are collected from the literature. The accuracy and biases affecting the methods used to estimate these quantities are discussed and best-estimates are strictly selected. Bulk densities are subsequently computed and compared with meteorite density, allowing to estimate the macroporosity within these bodies. Dwarf-planets apparently have no macroporosity, while smaller bodies can have large voids. This trend is apparently…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
