Direct imaging constraints on planet populations detected by microlensing
Sascha P. Quanz (1), David Lafreniere (2), Michael R. Meyer (1),, Maddalena M. Reggiani (1), and Esther Buenzli (3) ((1) ETH Zurich, (2), Universite de Montreal, (3) Steward Observatory)

TL;DR
This study reevaluates the constraints from direct imaging on planetary populations suggested by microlensing, finding that current limits may underestimate the true frequency of giant planets at large separations, impacting interpretations of free-floating planet populations.
Contribution
It critically analyzes and reinterprets existing direct imaging data to refine constraints on giant planet occurrence rates at wide orbits, aligning these with microlensing results.
Findings
Upper limits on star-planet systems are likely underestimated.
A planetary surface density slope of ~0.5-0.6 fits observational data.
More planets may be bound to stars than previously thought.
Abstract
Results from gravitational microlensing suggested the existence of a large population of free-floating planetary mass objects. The main conclusion from this work was partly based on constraints from a direct imaging survey. This survey determined upper limits for the frequency of stars that harbor giant exoplanets at large orbital separations. Aims. We want to verify to what extent upper limits from direct imaging do indeed constrain the microlensing results. We examine the current derivation of the upper limits used in the microlensing study and re-analyze the data from the corresponding imaging survey. We focus on the mass and semi-major axis ranges that are most relevant in context of the microlensing results. We also consider new results from a recent M-dwarf imaging survey as these objects are typically the host stars for planets detected by microlensing. We find that the upper…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
