On the Validity of Covariate Adjustment for Estimating Causal Effects
Ilya Shpitser, Tyler VanderWeele, James M. Robins

TL;DR
This paper provides a complete graphical criterion for covariate adjustment in causal inference, clarifying when covariate adjustment yields valid causal effect estimates from observational data.
Contribution
It introduces the adjustment criterion, a comprehensive graphical condition for covariate adjustment, and explores its completeness and implications.
Findings
The adjustment criterion is both necessary and sufficient for valid covariate adjustment.
Derived corollaries clarify the scope and limitations of covariate adjustment.
Provides a theoretical foundation for causal effect estimation using covariates.
Abstract
Identifying effects of actions (treatments) on outcome variables from observational data and causal assumptions is a fundamental problem in causal inference. This identification is made difficult by the presence of confounders which can be related to both treatment and outcome variables. Confounders are often handled, both in theory and in practice, by adjusting for covariates, in other words considering outcomes conditioned on treatment and covariate values, weighed by probability of observing those covariate values. In this paper, we give a complete graphical criterion for covariate adjustment, which we term the adjustment criterion, and derive some interesting corollaries of the completeness of this criterion.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Inference
