On Measurement Bias in Causal Inference
Judea Pearl

TL;DR
This paper explores how measurement errors affect causal inference and presents algebraic and graphical methods to eliminate systematic bias caused by such errors, focusing on confounder control and bias-free effect estimation.
Contribution
It introduces novel algebraic and graphical techniques for controlling measurement bias in causal inference models, addressing both parametric and non-parametric cases.
Findings
Methods for eliminating measurement bias in causal models.
Techniques for controlling partially observable confounders.
Approaches for bias-free effect estimation in complex models.
Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of measurement errors in causal inference and highlights several algebraic and graphical methods for eliminating systematic bias induced by such errors. In particulars, the paper discusses the control of partially observable confounders in parametric and non parametric models and the computational problem of obtaining bias-free effect estimates in such models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Inference
