The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Design, Observations, Data Reduction, and Redshifts
Jeffrey A. Newman, Michael C. Cooper, Marc Davis, S. M. Faber, Alison, L. Coil, Puragra Guhathakurta, David C. Koo, Andrew C. Phillips, Charlie, Conroy, Aaron A. Dutton, Douglas P. Finkbeiner, Brian F. Gerke, David J., Rosario, Benjamin J. Weiner, Christopher N. A. Willmer

TL;DR
The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey is the largest and most precise survey of galaxies at z ~ 1, providing extensive spectral data, redshifts, and insights into galaxy properties and large-scale structure, with detailed data reduction and analysis methods.
Contribution
This paper details the design, data collection, reduction, and data release of the DEEP2 survey, offering a comprehensive resource for galaxy evolution studies at z ~ 1.
Findings
Nearly 53,000 spectra obtained.
Over 38,000 reliable redshifts measured.
High spectral resolution enabling internal kinematic studies.
Abstract
We describe the design and data sample from the DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey, the densest and largest precision-redshift survey of galaxies at z ~ 1 completed to date. The survey has conducted a comprehensive census of massive galaxies, their properties, environments, and large-scale structure down to absolute magnitude M_B = -20 at z ~ 1 via ~90 nights of observation on the DEIMOS spectrograph at Keck Observatory. DEEP2 covers an area of 2.8 deg^2 divided into four separate fields, observed to a limiting apparent magnitude of R_AB=24.1. Objects with z < 0.7 are rejected based on BRI photometry in three of the four DEEP2 fields, allowing galaxies with z > 0.7 to be targeted ~2.5 times more efficiently than in a purely magnitude-limited sample. Approximately sixty percent of eligible targets are chosen for spectroscopy, yielding nearly 53,000 spectra and more than 38,000 reliable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
