Reconnection Studies Under Different Types of Turbulence Driving
Grzegorz Kowal, Alex Lazarian, Ethan T. Vishniac, Katarzyna, Otmianowska-Mazur

TL;DR
This study uses 3D simulations to compare different turbulence driving methods in magnetic reconnection, confirming the Lazarian and Vishniac (1999) model's predictions and exploring viscosity effects.
Contribution
It introduces a new real-space turbulence injection method and demonstrates its consistency with previous Fourier-space methods in reconnection studies.
Findings
Reconnection speed scales with turbulence power and injection scale as predicted.
Different turbulence driving methods produce consistent reconnection scalings.
Weak dependence of reconnection speed on viscosity, approximately as $ u^{-1/4}$.
Abstract
We study a model of fast magnetic reconnection in the presence of weak turbulence proposed by Lazarian and Vishniac (1999) using three-dimensional direct numerical simulations. The model has been already successfully tested in Kowal et al. (2009) confirming the dependencies of the reconnection speed on the turbulence injection power and the injection scale expressed by a constraint and no observed dependency on Ohmic resistivity. In Kowal et al. (2009), in order to drive turbulence, we injected velocity fluctuations in Fourier space with frequencies concentrated around , as described in Alvelius (1999). In this paper we extend our previous studies by comparing fast magnetic reconnection under different mechanisms of turbulence injection by introducing a new way of turbulence driving. The new…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
