Limitations of X-ray reflectometry in the presence of surface contamination
David L. Gil, Donald Windover

TL;DR
Surface contamination significantly impacts the accuracy of X-ray reflectometry measurements, and cleaning protocols are essential regardless of data source quality, as contamination effects can dominate uncertainty estimates.
Contribution
This study quantifies how surface contamination affects XRR thickness measurements and compares the impact of synchrotron versus laboratory sources, highlighting the importance of cleaning procedures.
Findings
Contamination can dominate uncertainty in XRR measurements.
Synchrotron sources do not significantly outperform laboratory sources in contaminated conditions.
Cleaning protocols are crucial for accurate XRR analysis.
Abstract
Intentionally deposited thin films exposed to atmosphere often develop unintentionally deposited few monolayer films of surface contamination. This contamination arises from the diverse population of volatile organics and inorganics in the atmosphere. Such surface contamination can affect the uncertainties in determination of thickness, roughness and density of thin film structures by X-Ray Reflectometry (XRR). Here we study the effect of a 0.5 nm carbon surface contamination layer on thickness determination for a 20 nm titanium nitride thin film on silicon. Uncertainties calculated using Markov-Chain Monte Carlo Bayesian statistical methods from simulated data of clean and contaminated TiN thin films are compared at varying degrees of data quality to study (1) whether synchrotron sources cope better with contamination than laboratory sources and (2) whether cleaning off the surface of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
