Atmospheric characterization of cold exoplanets using a 1.5-m coronagraphic space telescope
A.-L. Maire, R. Galicher, A. Boccaletti, P. Baudoz, J. Schneider, K., L. Cahoy, D. M. Stam, W. A. Traub

TL;DR
This study evaluates the capabilities of a 1.5-meter coronagraphic space telescope, SPICES, to characterize atmospheres of cold exoplanets, focusing on spectral analysis, surface properties, and potential targets within nearby stellar systems.
Contribution
The paper provides a performance assessment of SPICES for atmospheric characterization of cold exoplanets using realistic spectra and instrument limitations, highlighting its potential scientific reach.
Findings
SPICES can study Jupiters and Neptunes up to 5 and 2 AU respectively within 10 pc.
It can analyze cloud and surface coverage of super-Earths at 1 AU.
Potential to characterize Earth-sized planets around nearby stars like alpha Cen A and B.
Abstract
Context. High-contrast imaging is currently the only available technique for the study of the thermodynamical and compositional properties of exoplanets in long-period orbits. The SPICES project is a coronagraphic space telescope dedicated to the spectro-polarimetric analysis of gaseous and icy giant planets as well as super-Earths at visible wavelengths. So far, studies for high-contrast imaging instruments have mainly focused on technical feasibility because of the challenging planet/star flux ratio of 10-8-10-10 required at short separations (200 mas or so) to image cold exoplanets. However, the analysis of planet atmospheric/surface properties has remained largely unexplored. Aims. The aim of this paper is to determine which planetary properties SPICES or an equivalent direct imaging mission can measure, considering realistic reflected planet spectra and instrument limitation.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
