Strong biases in infrared-selected gravitational lenses
Stephen Serjeant

TL;DR
This paper investigates how differential magnification affects the interpretation of infrared and submm gravitational lens surveys, revealing that it biases estimates of galaxy properties unless corrected with detailed lens models.
Contribution
It provides a quantitative analysis of differential magnification effects on simulated surveys, highlighting the impact on emission diagnostics and bolometric fraction estimates.
Findings
Certain emission line diagnostics are minimally affected by differential magnification.
Infrared surveys tend to select high-redshift galaxies with AGN near caustics.
Submm/mm surveys preferentially boost star formation regions in lensing galaxies.
Abstract
Bright submm-selected galaxies have been found to be a rich source of strong gravitational lenses. However, strong gravitational lensing of extended sources leads inevitably to differential magnification. In this paper I quantify the effect of differential magnification on simulated far-infrared and submm surveys of strong gravitational lenses, using a foreground population of Navarro-Frenk-White plus de Vaucouleurs' density profiles, with a model source resembling the Cosmic Eyelash and QSO J1148+5251. Some emission line diagnostics are surprisingly unaffected by differential magnification effects: for example, the bolometric fractions of [C II] 158um and CO(J=1-0), often used to infer densities and ionisation parameters, have typical differential magnification effects that are smaller than the measurement errors. However, the CO ladder itself is significantly affected. Far-infrared…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
