Evolution of luminosity function and obscuration of AGN: connecting X-ray and Infrared

TL;DR

This study compares X-ray and infrared luminosity functions of AGN, revealing discrepancies that can be addressed by considering the UV-X-ray slope correlation and different obscuration mechanisms, advancing understanding of AGN evolution.

Contribution

It introduces a detailed comparison of X-ray and IR luminosity functions of AGN using a torus model and explores factors affecting their consistency, including spectral slope correlations and obscuration differences.

Findings

IR luminosity functions underestimate the most IR-luminous AGN.

Considering the UV-X-ray slope correlation resolves discrepancies.

Different obscuration mechanisms for quasars and Seyferts improve consistency.

Abstract

We present a detailed comparison between the 2-10 keV hard X-ray and infrared (IR) luminosity function (LF) of active galactic nuclei (AGN). The composite X-ray to IR spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of AGN used for connecting the hard X-ray LF (HXLF) and IR LF (IRLF) are modeled with a simple but well tested torus model based on the radiative transfer and photoionization code CLOUDY. Four observational determinations of the evolution of 2-10 keV HXLF and six evolution models of the obscured type-2 AGN fraction ($f_2$) have been considered. The 8.0 and 15 \micron LFs for the total, unobscured type-1 and obscured type-2 AGN are predicted from the HXLFs, and then compared with the measurements currently available. We find that the IRLFs predicted from HXLFs tend to underestimate the number of the most IR-luminous AGN. This is independent of the choices of HXLF and $f_2$, and even more obvious for the HXLFs recently measured. We show that the discrepancy between the HXLFs and IRLFs can be largely resolved when the anticorrelation between the UV to X-ray slope $\alpha_{\mathrm{ox}}$ and UV luminosity $L_{\rm UV}$ is appropriately considered. We also discuss other possible explanations for the discrepancy, such as the missing population of Compton-thick AGN and possible contribution of star-formation in the host to the mid-IR. Meanwhile, we find that the HXLFs and IRLFs of AGN can be more consistent with each other if the obscuration mechanisms of quasars and Seyferts are assumed to be different, corresponding to their different triggering and fueling mechanisms. More accurate measurements of the IRLFs of AGN, especially that determined at smaller redshift bins and more accurately separated to that for type-1 and type-2, are very helpful for clarifying these interesting issues.