Cosmological measure with volume averaging and the vacuum energy problem
Artyom V. Astashenok, Antonino Del Popolo

TL;DR
This paper proposes a volume averaging measure as a solution to the cosmological constant problem, explaining why the observed vacuum energy is non-zero, contrasting with traditional volume weighting approaches.
Contribution
It introduces an alternative volume averaging measure that resolves the incoherent predictions of volume weighting regarding the cosmological constant.
Findings
Volume averaging predicts a non-zero cosmological constant.
Traditional volume weighting predicts a probability of 1 for zero cosmological constant.
The new measure offers a coherent explanation for observed vacuum energy.
Abstract
In this paper, we give a possible solution to the cosmological constant problem. It is shown hat the traditional approach, based on volume weighting of probabilities, leads to an incoherent onclusion: the probability that a randomly chosen observer measures is exactly equal to 1. Using an alternative, volume averaging measure, instead of volume weighting can explain why the osmological constant is non-zero.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
