Meissner effect cannot be explained classically
Daijiro Yoshioka

TL;DR
The paper argues that the Meissner effect, a key feature of superconductivity, cannot be explained by classical physics and requires quantum mechanics for proper understanding, especially regarding magnetic field energy and Cooper pair condensation.
Contribution
It refutes classical explanations of the Meissner effect and emphasizes the quantum mechanical nature of Cooper pair condensation as essential for understanding superconductivity.
Findings
Classical physics cannot fully explain the Meissner effect.
Proper magnetic field energy treatment highlights the quantum nature of the effect.
Condensation energy of Cooper pairs is crucial for the Meissner effect.
Abstract
The Meissner effect is an important characteristic of superconductivity and is critical to distinguishing superconductivity from simply the absence of electrical resistance (perfect conductivity). In a recent paper published in American Journal of Physics, Ess\'en and Fiolhais claimed that the Meissner effect is explained by classical physics. [Am. J. Phys. {\textbf{80}} 164, (2012).] We claim it cannot be understood by classical mechanics and point out that their derivation of the Meissner effect by classical physics is based on an inadequate treatment of the magnetic field energy. A correct treatment of the magnetic field energy clarifies the need for quantum mechanics to understand the Meissner effect. We stress that Meissner effect is energetically favorable due to the energy of condensation of the Cooper pairs. The condensation of electrons into Cooper pairs is best understood as a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMolecular spectroscopy and chirality · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
