BLR kinematics and Black Hole Mass in Markarian 6
V.T. Doroshenko (1,2,3), S.G. Sergeev (1,3), S.A. Klimanov (4), V.I., Pronik (1,3), Yu.S. Efimov (1) ((1) Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, (2), Crimean Laboratory of the Sternberg Astronomical Institute, (3) Isaak Newton, Institute of Chile

TL;DR
This study analyzes the BLR kinematics and estimates the black hole mass in Markarian 6 using optical spectral data, revealing a combination of Keplerian and infall motions and confirming the black hole mass through reverberation mapping.
Contribution
First detailed reverberation mapping of Markarian 6's BLR, combining velocity-delay analysis with Monte Carlo simulations to determine black hole mass and kinematic structure.
Findings
BLR lag for Hbeta is 21.1 days, for Halpha about 27 days.
BLR kinematics show signs of Keplerian and infall motions.
Black hole mass estimated at (1.8±0.2)×10^8 solar masses.
Abstract
We present results of the optical spectral and photometric observations of the nucleus of Markarian 6 made with the 2.6-m Shajn telescope at the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory. The continuum and emission Balmer line intensities varied more than by a factor of two during 1992-2008. The lag between the continuum and Hbeta emission line flux variations is 21.1+-1.9 days. For the Halpha line the lag is about 27 days but its uncertainty is much larger. We use Monte-Carlo simulation of the random time series to check the effect of our data sampling on the lag uncertainties and we compare our simulation results with those obtained by random subset selection (RSS) method of Peterson et al. (1998). The lag in the high-velocity wings are shorter than in the line core in accordance with the virial motions. However, the lag is slightly larger in the blue wing than in the red wing. This is a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
