A comparative evaluation of two algorithms of detection of masses on mammograms
Guillaume Kom, Alain Tiedeu, Martin Kom, John Ngundam

TL;DR
This paper compares two computer-aided detection algorithms for mammogram masses, evaluating their effectiveness in detection, size, and shape preservation using a 60-image database.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of two distinct algorithms for mammogram mass detection, highlighting their relative strengths and weaknesses.
Findings
Algorithm 1 shows higher detection accuracy.
Algorithm 2 better preserves mass shape.
Both algorithms have specific advantages in different detection aspects.
Abstract
In this paper, we implement and carry out the comparison of two methods of computer-aided-detection of masses on mammograms. The two algorithms basically consist of 3 steps each: segmentation, binarization and noise suppression using different techniques for each step. A database of 60 images was used to compare the performance of the two algorithms in terms of general detection efficiency, conservation of size and shape of detected masses.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
