Surface roughness interpretation of 730 kg days CRESST-II results
M. Ku\'zniak, M. G. Boulay, T. Pollmann

TL;DR
This paper reinterprets the CRESST-II dark matter search results by proposing that surface roughness and ion sputtering effects can explain the observed excess events, challenging the dark matter signal attribution.
Contribution
It introduces a novel surface roughness model combined with ion sputtering effects to explain excess events in dark matter detection experiments.
Findings
Surface roughness significantly affects event interpretation.
Ion sputtering can mimic dark matter signals.
Revised background model reduces the excess attributed to dark matter.
Abstract
The analysis presented in the recent publication of the CRESST-II results finds a statistically significant excess of registered events over known background contributions in the acceptance region and attributes the excess to a possible Dark Matter signal, caused by scattering of relatively light WIMPs. We propose a mechanism which explains the excess events with ion sputtering caused by 206Pb recoils and alpha particles from 210Po decay, combined with realistic surface roughness effects.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
