Does Geometric Algebra provide a loophole to Bell's Theorem? (with corrections)
Richard D. Gill

TL;DR
This paper critically examines Joy Christian's claims of refuting Bell's theorem using Geometric Algebra, highlighting mathematical errors and misunderstandings in his models that have persisted despite multiple refutations.
Contribution
The paper analyzes and clarifies the mathematical and logical flaws in Christian's models, providing a resource to evaluate future disproofs of Bell's theorem.
Findings
Christian's models contain hidden sign errors.
His interpretations rely on misunderstandings of Bell's work.
Repeated attempts to refute Bell's theorem are flawed due to mathematical inaccuracies.
Abstract
In 2007, and in a series of later papers, Joy Christian claimed to refute Bell's theorem, presenting an alleged local realistic model of the singlet correlations using techniques from Geometric Algebra (GA). Several authors published papers refuting his claims, and Christian's ideas did not gain acceptance. However, he recently succeeded in publishing yet more ambitious and complex versions of his theory in fairly mainstream journals. How could this be? The mathematics and logic of Bell's theorem is simple and transparent and has been intensely studied and debated for over 50 years. Christian claims to have a mathematical counterexample to a purely mathematical theorem. Each new version of Christian's model used new devices to circumvent Bell's theorem or depended on a new way to misunderstand Bell's work. These devices and misinterpretations are in common use by other Bell critics, so…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
