Kepler Presearch Data Conditioning II - A Bayesian Approach to Systematic Error Correction
Jeffrey C. Smith, Martin C. Stumpe, Jeffrey E. Van Cleve, Jon M., Jenkins, Thomas S. Barclay, Michael N. Fanelli, Forrest R. Girouard, Jeffery, J. Kolodziejczak, Sean D. McCauliff, Robert L. Morris, Joseph D. Twicken

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian MAP method for Kepler data correction that effectively removes systematic errors while preserving astrophysical signals, especially variable stars, outperforming traditional cotrending techniques.
Contribution
It presents a novel Bayesian approach using priors and posterior PDFs to improve systematic error correction in Kepler photometry, maintaining astrophysical signals.
Findings
Enhanced removal of systematic errors compared to traditional methods
Better preservation of variable star signals
Reduced noise injection and signal distortion
Abstract
With the unprecedented photometric precision of the Kepler Spacecraft, significant systematic and stochastic errors on transit signal levels are observable in the Kepler photometric data. These errors, which include discontinuities, outliers, systematic trends and other instrumental signatures, obscure astrophysical signals. The Presearch Data Conditioning (PDC) module of the Kepler data analysis pipeline tries to remove these errors while preserving planet transits and other astrophysically interesting signals. The completely new noise and stellar variability regime observed in Kepler data poses a significant problem to standard cotrending methods such as SYSREM and TFA. Variable stars are often of particular astrophysical interest so the preservation of their signals is of significant importance to the astrophysical community. We present a Bayesian Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) approach…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
