Study of exclusive one-pion and one-eta production using hadron and dielectron channels in pp reactions at kinetic beam energies of 1.25 GeV and 2.2 GeV with HADES
HADES Collaboration: G. Agakishiev, H. Alvarez-Pol, A. Balanda, R., Bassini, M. B\"ohmer, H. Bokemeyer, J. L. Boyard, P. Cabanelas, S. Chernenko,, T. Christ, M. Destefanis, F. Dohrmann, A. Dybczak, T. Eberl, L. Fabbietti, O., Fateev, P. Finocchiaro, J. Friese, I. Fr\"ohlich

TL;DR
This study measures exclusive pion and eta production in proton-proton collisions at 1.25 and 2.2 GeV using hadron and dielectron channels, providing detailed distributions and cross sections to improve understanding of baryon resonance contributions.
Contribution
It offers high-statistics invariant-mass and angular distributions, compares data to resonance models, and refines parameterizations for baryon resonance production in pp reactions.
Findings
Consistent yields between hadronic and dielectron channels.
Cross section for pp → pp η at 2.2 GeV is 0.142 ± 0.022 mb.
Data agree with model predictions for invariant mass and angular distributions.
Abstract
We present measurements of exclusive \pi^{+,0} and \eta\ production in pp reactions at 1.25 GeV and 2.2 GeV beam kinetic energy in hadron and dielectron channels. In the case of \pi^+ and \pi^0, high-statistics invariant-mass and angular distributions are obtained within the HADES acceptance as well as acceptance corrected distributions, which are compared to a resonance model. The sensitivity of the data to the yield and production angular distribution of \Delta(1232) and higher lying baryon resonances is shown, and an improved parameterization is proposed. The extracted cross sections are of special interest in the case of pp \to pp \eta, since controversial data exist at 2.0 GeV; we find \sigma =0.142 \pm 0.022 mb. Using the dielectron channels, the \pi^0 and \eta\ Dalitz decay signals are reconstructed with yields fully consistent with the hadronic channels. The electron invariant…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
