The evolvability of business and the role of antitrust
Ian Wilkinson (The University of Sydney)

TL;DR
This paper advocates expanding antitrust policy criteria to include business evolvability, emphasizing network impacts and dynamic considerations from complex adaptive systems theory to better inform case analysis.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of evolvability into antitrust analysis, integrating complex adaptive systems theory to account for network impacts beyond traditional economizing criteria.
Findings
Evolvability criteria can enhance antitrust decision-making.
Network impacts influence business evolution and market dynamics.
Incorporating these factors can improve antitrust policy effectiveness.
Abstract
In this paper, based on theories of complex adaptive systems, I argue that the main case for antitrust policy should be extended to include the criteria of "evolvability." To date, the main case focuses on economizing, including market power as a key filter for identifying suspect cases. Both production and transaction costs are considered as part of economizing and other factors are use to consider the benefits of different industry structures. CAS analysis focuses attention on dynamics, evolution and networks. As I will show, the criteria of evolvability requires us to consider various types of direct and indirect network impacts in business that go beyond the traditional focus on production and transaction costs. These network impacts stem from the connections between transactions and relations over time and place, including how business arrangements at one time, limit or enable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
