Cosmology with clustering anisotropies: disentangling dynamic and geometric distortions in galaxy redshift surveys
Federico Marulli, Davide Bianchi, Enzo Branchini, Luigi Guzzo, Lauro, Moscardini, Raul E. Angulo

TL;DR
This paper examines how observational effects like redshift errors and geometric distortions influence measurements of galaxy clustering anisotropies, proposing methods to disentangle these effects and accurately recover cosmological parameters.
Contribution
It introduces a modified Alcock-Paczynski test that effectively separates dynamical and geometric distortions in galaxy redshift surveys, improving cosmological parameter estimation.
Findings
Redshift errors up to 0.2% have negligible impact on growth rate measurements.
A Gaussian pairwise velocity distribution reduces systematic errors from larger redshift uncertainties.
The modified Alcock-Paczynski test successfully recovers correct cosmology and parameters with minimal bias.
Abstract
We investigate the impact of different observational effects affecting a precise and accurate measurement of the growth rate of fluctuations from the anisotropy of clustering in galaxy redshift surveys. We focus on redshift measurement errors, on the reconstruction of the underlying real-space clustering and on the apparent degeneracy existing with the geometrical distortions induced by the cosmology-dependent conversion of redshifts into distances. We use a suite of mock catalogues extracted from large N-body simulations, focusing on the analysis of intermediate, mildly non-linear scales and apply the standard linear dispersion model to fit the anisotropy of the observed correlation function. We verify that redshift errors up to ~0.2% have a negligible impact on the precision with which the specific growth rate beta can be measured. Larger redshift errors introduce a positive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
