Response to `Comment on "Experimental demonstration of a universally valid error-disturbance uncertainty relation in spin measurements" '
Jacqueline Erhart, Stephan Sponar, Georg Sulyok, Gerald Badurek,, Masanao Ozawa, and Yuji Hasegawa

TL;DR
This paper refutes a previous comment on a quantum uncertainty relation experiment, clarifying that the comment's argument is based on an improper basis and is therefore incorrect.
Contribution
It provides a rebuttal to a critique of a quantum measurement uncertainty relation, reaffirming the validity of the original experimental results.
Findings
The comment's argument is based on an improper basis.
The original uncertainty relation experiment remains valid.
The authors disagree with the critique's conclusion.
Abstract
Here, we reply to the comment by Y. Kurihara. We show that the argument by the author is on an improper basis and thus disagree with his opinion.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRadioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques · Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
