How much could we cover a set by c.e sets?
Farzad Didehvar, Mohsen Mansouri, Zahra Taheri

TL;DR
This paper explores the extent to which arbitrary sets can be covered by computably enumerable (c.e.) sets, introducing a new perspective and definitions in computability theory to analyze set coverage.
Contribution
It proposes a novel approach to measure how much an arbitrary set can be covered by c.e. sets, offering new definitions and insights in computability theory.
Findings
Introduced a new framework for set coverage by c.e. sets
Provided initial definitions and methods for measuring coverage
Explored the relationship between arbitrary sets and c.e. sets in computability
Abstract
"How much c.e. sets could cover a given set?" in this paper we are going to answer this question. Also, in this approach some old concepts come into a new arrangement. The major goal of this article is to introduce an appropriate definition for this purpose. Introduction In Computability Theory (Recursion Theory) in the first step we wish to recognize the sets which could be enumerated by Turing machines (equivalently, algorithms) and in the next step we will compare these sets by some reasonable order (Like Turing degree). Also sometimes with some extra information (Oracles) a class of non c.e. sets show the same behavior as c.e. sets (Post hierarchy and related theorems). Here we try another approach: "Let A be an arbitrary set and we wish to recognize how much this set might be covered by a c.e. set?" Although in some sense this approach could be seen in some definitions of Recursion…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
