Tuning supersymmetric models at the LHC: A comparative analysis at two-loop level

TL;DR

This paper compares fine-tuning measures in various supersymmetric models at the two-loop level, analyzing how they relate to experimental constraints and Higgs mass, revealing minimal tuning near 115 GeV and significant increases near 125 GeV.

Contribution

It provides a detailed two-loop level comparison of fine-tuning in multiple SUSY models, linking theoretical constraints with experimental bounds and Bayesian likelihood.

Findings

Minimal fine tuning occurs near Higgs mass 115 GeV with Delta around 10-100.

Fine tuning increases dramatically to 500-1000 near Higgs mass 125 GeV.

Different fine-tuning definitions yield similar results within data-allowed regions.

Abstract

We provide a comparative study of the fine tuning amount (Delta) at the two-loop leading log level in supersymmetric models commonly used in SUSY searches at the LHC. These are the constrained MSSM (CMSSM), non-universal Higgs masses models (NUHM1, NUHM2), non-universal gaugino masses model (NUGM) and GUT related gaugino masses models (NUGMd). Two definitions of the fine tuning are used, the first (Delta_{max}) measures maximal fine-tuning wrt individual parameters while the second (Delta_q) adds their contribution in "quadrature". As a direct result of two theoretical constraints (the EW minimum conditions), fine tuning (Delta_q) emerges as a suppressing factor (effective prior) of the averaged likelihood (under the priors), under the integral of the global probability of measuring the data (Bayesian evidence p(D)). For each model, there is little difference between Delta_q, Delta_{max} in the region allowed by the data, with similar behaviour as functions of the Higgs, gluino, stop mass or SUSY scale (m_{susy}=(m_{\tilde t_1} m_{\tilde t_2})^{1/2}) or dark matter and g-2 constraints. The analysis has the advantage that by replacing any of these mass scales or constraints by their latest bounds one easily infers for each model the value of Delta_q, Delta_{max} or vice versa. For all models, minimal fine tuning is achieved for M_{higgs} near 115 GeV with a Delta_q\approx Delta_{max}\approx 10 to 100 depending on the model, and in the CMSSM this is actually a global minimum. Due to a strong ($\approx$ exponential) dependence of Delta on M_{higgs}, for a Higgs mass near 125 GeV, the above values of Delta_q\approx Delta_{max} increase to between 500 and 1000. Possible corrections to these values are briefly discussed.