Topological susceptibility on the lattice and the three-flavour quark condensate
Veronique Bernard (IPN Orsay), Sebastien Descotes-Genon (LPT, Orsay),, Guillaume Toucas (LPT, Orsay)

TL;DR
This paper reanalyzes the topological susceptibility in lattice QCD to better understand the three-flavour quark condensate, highlighting the importance of simulation conditions and providing updated quantitative estimates.
Contribution
It introduces a combined fit approach using resummed ChPT to extract the three-flavour quark condensate from lattice data, considering the effects of quark mass hierarchy and vacuum fluctuations.
Findings
The three-flavour quark condensate is approximately 243 MeV.
Simulations with equal light quark masses are more effective for disentangling condensate contributions.
There is a significant suppression of the three-flavour condensate compared to the two-flavour case.
Abstract
We reanalyse the topological susceptibility assuming the possibility of a significant paramagnetic suppression of the three-flavour quark condensate and a correlated enhancement of vacuum fluctuations of pairs. Using the framework of resummed ChPT, we point out that simulations performed near the physical point, with a significant mass hierarchy between u,d and s dynamical quarks, are not able to disentangle the contributions from the quark condensate and sea -pair fluctuations, and that simulations with three light quark masses of the same order are better suited for this purpose. We perform a combined fit of recent RBC/UKQCD data on pseudoscalar masses and decay constants as well as the topological susceptibility, and we reconsider the determination of lattice spacings in our framework, working out the consequences on the parameters of the chiral Lagrangian. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
