Complexity computation for compact 3-manifolds via crystallizations and Heegaard diagrams
Maria Rita Casali, Paola Cristofori, Michele Mulazzani

TL;DR
This paper extends the concept of modified Heegaard complexity to non-orientable 3-manifolds and proves its equivalence with Gem-Matveev complexity for closed 3-manifolds, providing tools to estimate Matveev complexity.
Contribution
It generalizes the modified Heegaard complexity to non-orientable cases and establishes its equivalence with Gem-Matveev complexity for closed 3-manifolds.
Findings
Gem-Matveev and modified Heegaard complexities coincide for closed 3-manifolds.
Both complexities provide upper bounds for Matveev complexity.
Extension of modified Heegaard complexity to non-orientable 3-manifolds.
Abstract
The idea of computing Matveev complexity by using Heegaard decompositions has been recently developed by two different approaches: the first one for closed 3-manifolds via crystallization theory, yielding the notion of Gem-Matveev complexity; the other one for compact orientable 3-manifolds via generalized Heegaard diagrams, yielding the notion of modified Heegaard complexity. In this paper we extend to the non-orientable case the definition of modified Heegaard complexity and prove that for closed 3-manifolds Gem-Matveev complexity and modified Heegaard complexity coincide. Hence, they turn out to be useful different tools to compute the same upper bound for Matveev complexity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
