Dust SEDs in the era of Herschel and Planck: a Hierarchical Bayesian fitting technique
Brandon C. Kelly (UCSB, CfA), Rahul Shetty (ITA, Heidelberg), Amelia, M. Stutz (MPIA), Jens Kauffmann (JPL), Alyssa A. Goodman (CfA), Ralf, Launhardt (MPIA)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a hierarchical Bayesian method for fitting dust emission spectral energy distributions, effectively addressing the T-beta degeneracy and measurement uncertainties, leading to more accurate parameter estimates than traditional chi-square approaches.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel hierarchical Bayesian approach for SED fitting that improves parameter accuracy and eliminates artificial correlations caused by measurement noise.
Findings
Bayesian method yields more accurate T and beta estimates.
No spurious T-beta anti-correlation in Bayesian fits.
Reduced parameter range compared to chi-square fits.
Abstract
We present a hierarchical Bayesian method for fitting infrared spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of dust emission to observed fluxes. Under the standard assumption of optically thin single temperature (T) sources the dust SED as represented by a power--law modified black body is subject to a strong degeneracy between T and the spectral index beta. The traditional non-hierarchical approaches, typically based on chi-square minimization, are severely limited by this degeneracy, as it produces an artificial anti-correlation between T and beta even with modest levels of observational noise. The hierarchical Bayesian method rigorously and self-consistently treats measurement uncertainties, including calibration and noise, resulting in more precise SED fits. As a result, the Bayesian fits do not produce any spurious anti-correlations between the SED parameters due to measurement…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
