The Complexity of Controlling Candidate-Sequential Elections
Edith Hemaspaandra, Lane A. Hemaspaandra, and Joerg Rothe

TL;DR
This paper explores the complexity of controlling candidate elections in a sequential, online setting, revealing PSPACE-completeness and providing polynomial algorithms for plurality elections.
Contribution
It introduces a new model for online candidate control in sequential elections and analyzes its computational complexity, including polynomial algorithms for key election systems.
Findings
PSPACE-completeness in the online control setting
Polynomial-time algorithms for plurality elections
Complexity differences between traditional and online models
Abstract
Candidate control of elections is the study of how adding or removing candidates can affect the outcome. However, the traditional study of the complexity of candidate control is in the model in which all candidates and votes are known up front. This paper develops a model for studying online control for elections where the structure is sequential with respect to the candidates, and in which the decision regarding adding and deleting must be irrevocably made at the moment the candidate is presented. We show that great complexity---PSPACE-completeness---can occur in this setting, but we also provide within this setting polynomial-time algorithms for the most important of election systems, plurality.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
