Why are quadratic normal volatility models analytically tractable?
Peter Carr, Travis Fisher, Johannes Ruf

TL;DR
This paper explains why Quadratic Normal Volatility models are analytically tractable by characterizing them as transformations of stopped Brownian motion, which accounts for their explicit option pricing formulas.
Contribution
It provides a characterization of Quadratic Normal Volatility models as transformations of stopped Brownian motion with a measure change depending on the terminal value.
Findings
Explicit formulas for option prices in these models.
Connection between model construction and Brownian motion transformations.
Clarification of the models' analytic tractability.
Abstract
We discuss the class of "Quadratic Normal Volatility" models, which have drawn much attention in the financial industry due to their analytic tractability and flexibility. We characterize these models as the ones that can be obtained from stopped Brownian motion by a simple transformation and a change of measure that only depends on the terminal value of the stopped Brownian motion. This explains the existence of explicit analytic formulas for option prices within Quadratic Normal Volatility models in the academic literature.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic processes and financial applications · Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
