Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler, III: Analysis of the First 16 Months of Data
Natalie M. Batalha (1), Jason F. Rowe (2), Stephen T. Bryson (3),, Thomas Barclay (4), Christopher J. Burke (2), Douglas A. Caldwell (2), Jessie, L. Christiansen (3), Fergal Mullally (2), Susan E. Thompson (2), Timothy M., Brown (5), Andrea K. Dupree (6), Daniel C. Fabrycky (7)

TL;DR
This paper reports the discovery and analysis of over 2,300 new planet candidates from Kepler data, emphasizing improved vetting methods, detailed characterization, and the potential for finding Earth-sized planets in habitable zones.
Contribution
It introduces enhanced vetting metrics and analysis techniques that increase catalog reliability and detail the properties of new planet candidates from the first 16 months of Kepler data.
Findings
Identification of 1,091 new planet candidates, increasing total to over 2,300.
Notable increase in small planet candidates and those with longer orbital periods.
Evidence of continued growth in multi-candidate systems and potential for Earth-size habitable zone planets.
Abstract
New transiting planet candidates are identified in sixteen months (May 2009 - September 2010) of data from the Kepler spacecraft. Nearly five thousand periodic transit-like signals are vetted against astrophysical and instrumental false positives yielding 1,091 viable new planet candidates, bringing the total count up to over 2,300. Improved vetting metrics are employed, contributing to higher catalog reliability. Most notable is the noise-weighted robust averaging of multi-quarter photo-center offsets derived from difference image analysis which identifies likely background eclipsing binaries. Twenty-two months of photometry are used for the purpose of characterizing each of the new candidates. Ephemerides (transit epoch, T_0, and orbital period, P) are tabulated as well as the products of light curve modeling: reduced radius (Rp/R*), reduced semi-major axis (d/R*), and impact…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
