Giant Monopole Resonances and nuclear incompressibilities studied for the zero-range and separable pairing interactions
P. Vesely, J. Toivanen, B.G. Carlsson, J. Dobaczewski, N. Michel, A., Pastore

TL;DR
This study investigates how different pairing interactions affect giant monopole resonances in semi-magic nuclei, revealing limitations of certain forces in matching experimental data and providing insights into nuclear incompressibility.
Contribution
It demonstrates that zero-range and separable pairing interactions cannot reconcile theoretical predictions with experimental monopole resonance data in tin isotopes.
Findings
The centroid difference between lead and tin resonances is overestimated by about 100%.
The volume incompressibility is larger than the infinite-matter value.
Zero-range and separable pairing forces do not modify monopole strength functions to match experiments.
Abstract
Background: Following the 2007 precise measurements of monopole strengths in tin isotopes, there has been a continuous theoretical effort to obtain a precise description of the experimental results. Up to now, there is no satisfactory explanation of why the tin nuclei appear to be significantly softer than 208Pb. Purpose: We determine the influence of finite-range and separable pairing interactions on monopole strength functions in semi-magic nuclei. Methods: We employ self-consistently the Quasiparticle Random Phase Approximation on top of spherical Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov solutions. We use the Arnoldi method to solve the linear-response problem with pairing. Results: We found that the difference between centroids of Giant Monopole Resonances measured in lead and tin (about 1 MeV) always turns out to be overestimated by about 100%. We also found that the volume incompressibility,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
