They might be giants: luminosity class, planet frequency, and planet-metallicity relation of the coolest Kepler target stars
Andrew W. Mann, Eric Gaidos, S\'ebastien L\'epine, Eric Hilton

TL;DR
This study refines stellar parameters of late K and early M Kepler stars, revealing a high giant star fraction among bright targets, and reassesses planet occurrence rates and metallicity correlations with improved classifications.
Contribution
It provides a more accurate classification of Kepler target stars, correcting previous misidentifications, and updates planet occurrence estimates based on these refined stellar parameters.
Findings
Giant stars constitute over 96% of bright Kepler targets.
Effective temperatures are systematically lower than KIC estimates.
Planet occurrence rate is higher when giants are properly excluded.
Abstract
We estimate the stellar parameters of late K and early M type Kepler target stars. We obtain medium resolution visible spectra of 382 stars with Kp-J>2 (~K5 and later spectral type). We determine luminosity class by comparing the strength of gravity-sensitive indices (CaH, K I, Ca II, and Na I) to their strength in a sample of stars of known luminosity class. We find that giants constitute 96+-% of the bright (Kp<14) Kepler target stars, and 7+-3% of dim (Kp>14) stars, significantly higher than fractions based on the stellar parameters quoted in the Kepler Input Catalog (KIC). The KIC effective temperatures are systematically (110 +15 -35} K) higher than temperatures we determine from fitting our spectra to PHOENIX stellar models. Through Monte Carlo simulations of the Kepler exoplanet candidate population, we find a planet occurrence of 0.36+-0.08 when giant stars are properly removed,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
