Quantifying the Biases of Spectroscopically Selected Gravitational Lenses
Ryan A. Arneson, Joel R. Brownstein, Adam S. Bolton

TL;DR
This paper uses simulations to quantify biases in spectroscopically selected gravitational lens samples, revealing specific biases related to Einstein radius and velocity dispersion, and emphasizing the importance of including non-lenses for unbiased analysis.
Contribution
The study provides a detailed quantification of selection biases in spectroscopic lens surveys, aiding in more accurate interpretation of lensing galaxy populations.
Findings
No significant mass axis ratio bias.
Negligible bias towards shallow density profiles.
Bias towards smaller Einstein radii in group/cluster-scale lenses.
Abstract
Spectroscopic selection has been the most productive technique for the selection of galaxy-scale strong gravitational lens systems with known redshifts. Statistically significant samples of strong lenses provide a powerful method for measuring the mass-density parameters of the lensing population, but results can only be generalized to the parent population if the lensing selection biases are sufficiently understood. We perform controlled Monte Carlo simulations of spectroscopic lens surveys in order to quantify the bias of lenses relative to parent galaxies in velocity dispersion, mass axis ratio, and mass density profile. For parameters typical of the SLACS and BELLS surveys, we find: (1) no significant mass axis ratio detection bias of lenses relative to parent galaxies; (2) a very small detection bias toward shallow mass density profiles, which is likely negligible compared to other…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
