The Critical Richardson Number and Limits of Applicability of Local Similarity Theory in the Stable Boundary Layer
Andrey A. Grachev, Edgar L Andreas, Christopher W. Fairall, Peter S., Guest, P. Ola G. Persson

TL;DR
This study identifies a critical Richardson number (~0.20-0.25) beyond which local similarity theory in the stable boundary layer fails due to the breakdown of turbulence energy cascades, limiting its applicability.
Contribution
It establishes a quantitative threshold for the Richardson number that delineates the limits of Monin-Obukhov similarity theory in stable atmospheric conditions.
Findings
The inertial subrange disappears when Ri and Rf exceed 0.20-0.25.
Turbulence becomes non-Kolmogorov and decays rapidly beyond the critical Richardson number.
Classical similarity theory applies only when Ri and Rf are below the critical thresholds.
Abstract
Measurements of atmospheric turbulence made over the Arctic pack ice during the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean experiment (SHEBA) are used to determine the limits of applicability of Monin-Obukhov similarity theory (in the local scaling formulation) in the stable atmospheric boundary layer. Based on the spectral analysis of wind velocity and air temperature fluctuations, it is shown that, when both of the gradient Richardson number, Ri, and the flux Richardson number, Rf, exceed a 'critical value' of about 0.20 - 0.25, the inertial subrange associated with the Richardson-Kolmogorov cascade dies out and vertical turbulent fluxes become small. Some small-scale turbulence survives even in this supercritical regime, but this is non-Kolmogorov turbulence, and it decays rapidly with further increasing stability. Similarity theory is based on the turbulent fluxes in the high-frequency…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
