Temperature dependence of the resonance and low energy spin excitations in superconducting FeTe$_{0.6}$Se$_{0.4}$
Leland W. Harriger, J. Lipscombe, Chenglin Zhang, Huiqian Luo, Meng, Wang, Karol Marty, M. D. Lumsden, Pengcheng Dai

TL;DR
This study investigates how low-energy spin excitations in superconducting FeTe$_{0.6}$Se$_{0.4}$ vary with temperature, revealing a neutron spin resonance that diminishes above $T_c$ but is not directly linked to the superconducting gap.
Contribution
It provides detailed temperature-dependent measurements of spin excitations in FeTe$_{0.6}$Se$_{0.4}$, highlighting differences from similar modes in other iron-based superconductors.
Findings
Resonance intensity decreases with temperature and disappears above $T_c$.
Resonance energy remains weakly temperature dependent and vanishes above $T_c$.
The mode is not directly associated with the superconducting electronic gap.
Abstract
We use inelastic neutron scattering to study the temperature dependence of the low-energy spin excitations in single crystals of superconducting FeTeSe ( K). In the low-temperature superconducting state, the imaginary part of the dynamic susceptibility at the electron and hole Fermi surfaces nesting wave vector , , has a small spin gap, a two-dimensional neutron spin resonance above the spin gap, and increases linearly with increasing for energies above the resonance. While the intensity of the resonance decreases like an order parameter with increasing temperature and disappears at temperature slightly above , the energy of the mode is weakly temperature dependent and vanishes concurrently above . This suggests that in spite of its similarities with the resonance in electron-doped…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
