CI-groups with respect to ternary relational structures: new examples
Edward Dobson, Pablo Spiga

TL;DR
This paper investigates conditions under which certain abelian groups are not CI-groups for ternary relational structures, identifying specific groups that satisfy these conditions and determining which are CI-groups for binary and ternary cases.
Contribution
It introduces a sufficient condition for non-CI-groups in ternary structures and classifies which groups of the form Z_2^3×Z_p are CI-groups, also showing Z_2^5 is not.
Findings
Z_3×Z_2^2, Z_7×Z_2^3, Z_5×Z_2^4 are not CI-groups
Complete classification of Z_2^3×Z_p as CI-groups for binary and ternary structures
Z_2^5 is not a CI-group for ternary structures
Abstract
We find a sufficient condition to establish that certain abelian groups are not CI-groups with respect to ternary relational structures, and then show that the groups , , and satisfy this condition. Then we completely determine which groups , a prime, are CI-groups with respect to binary and ternary relational structures. Finally, we show that is not a CI-group with respect to ternary relational structures.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinite Group Theory Research · Rings, Modules, and Algebras · Coding theory and cryptography
