Characterizing the nature of Fossil Groups with XMM
F. La Barbera, M. Paolillo, E. De Filippis, R. R. de Carvalho

TL;DR
This study uses XMM and Chandra observations to confirm the nature of six Fossil Group candidates, revealing that some are not true FGs and highlighting the importance of accurate flux estimation in identifying fossil groups.
Contribution
It provides the first X-ray confirmation of fossil groups from SDSS and RASS data, and discusses how flux estimation affects fossil group identification and their properties.
Findings
Four out of six candidates are confirmed as true FGs by X-ray emission.
Some candidates are actually AGN or blended sources, not true FGs.
Bright ellipticals in FGs are similar to non-fossil ellipticals, suggesting no distinct galaxy population.
Abstract
We present an X-ray follow-up, based on XMM plus Chandra, of six Fossil Group (FG) candidates identified in our previous work using SDSS and RASS data. Four candidates (out of six) exhibit extended X-ray emission, confirming them as true FGs. For the other two groups, the RASS emission has its origin as either an optically dull/X-ray bright AGN, or the blending of distinct X-ray sources. Using SDSS-DR7 data, we confirm, for all groups, the presence of an r-band magnitude gap between the seed elliptical and the second-rank galaxy. However, the gap value depends, up to 0.5mag, on how one estimates the seed galaxy total flux, which is greatly underestimated when using SDSS (relative to Sersic) magnitudes. This implies that many FGs may be actually missed when using SDSS data, a fact that should be carefully taken into account when comparing the observed number densities of FGs to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
