Modelling supermassive black hole growth: towards an improved sub-grid prescription
Alexander Hobbs, Chris Power, Sergei Nayakshin, Andrew King

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the Bondi-Hoyle accretion model in galaxy simulations, revealing its limitations and proposing an improved, interpolated sub-grid accretion prescription that accounts for different gas flow regimes around supermassive black holes.
Contribution
It introduces a new interpolated formula for SMBH accretion that better captures diverse gas flow conditions compared to traditional Bondi-Hoyle models.
Findings
Bondi-Hoyle model is only valid for specific hot, virialized, zero angular momentum gas.
Incorrect application of Bondi-Hoyle can cause significant errors in SMBH growth predictions.
Proposed formula interpolates between free-fall and Bondi-Hoyle regimes, improving simulation accuracy.
Abstract
Accretion onto supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in galaxy formation simulations is frequently modelled by the Bondi-Hoyle formalism. Here we examine the validity of this approach analytically and numerically. We argue that the character of the flow where one evaluates the gas properties is unlikely to satisfy the simple Bondi-Hoyle model. Only in the specific case of hot virialised gas with zero angular momentum and negligible radiative cooling is the Bondi-Hoyle solution relevant. In the opposite extreme, where the gas is in a state of free-fall at the evaluation radius due to efficient cooling and the dominant gravity of the surrounding halo, the Bondi-Hoyle formalism can be erroneous by orders of magnitude in either direction. This may impose artificial trends with halo mass in cosmological simulations by being wrong by different factors for different halo masses. We propose an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
