Sweeping Away the Mysteries of Dusty Continuous Winds in AGN
S. K. Keating (1,2), J. E. Everett (3), S. C. Gallagher (1), and R. P., Deo (1) ((1) University of Western Ontario, (2) University of Toronto, (3), University of Wisconsin)

TL;DR
This paper presents a dynamical model of dusty disk-winds in AGNs driven by magnetic and radiation forces, predicting IR spectra and outflow properties to better understand the AGN torus and its observational signatures.
Contribution
It introduces a self-similar dusty wind model driven by magnetocentrifugal forces and radiation pressure, linking physical parameters to IR spectral features in AGNs.
Findings
Models with high column density and specific Eddington ratios match observed IR spectra.
Varying X-ray to UV power ratio affects IR emission below 5 microns.
Predicted outflow velocities range from 1900 to 8000 km/s.
Abstract
An integral part of the Unified Model for Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) is an axisymmetric obscuring medium, which is commonly depicted as a torus of gas and dust surrounding the central engine. However, a robust, dynamical model of the torus is required in order to understand the fundamental physics of AGNs and interpret their observational signatures. Here we explore self-similar, dusty disk-winds, driven by both magnetocentrifugal forces and radiation pressure, as an explanation for the torus. Using these models, we make predictions of AGN infrared (IR) spectral energy distributions (SEDs) from 2-100 microns by varying parameters such as: the viewing angle; the base column density of the wind; the Eddington ratio; the black hole mass; and the amount of power in the input spectrum emitted in the X-ray relative to that emitted in the UV/optical. We find that models with N_H,0 = 10^25…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
